My father, Robert Seth Hayes, is a former Black
Panther Party Member and Political Prisoner. He has been incarcerated for 40
years, but this isn’t a message about the politics of mass-incarceration. This
is a message about a father who deserves to be home.
My father is one of the most gentle, caring, loving
individuals you’ll ever know. Prison hasn’t hardened his heart or his resolve
for freedom. He remains committed to
social justice and building safe communities.
If you’ve ever loved someone in prison, you know that prison is a place
where love goes to die. It’s designed to destroy families and to turn people
into monsters. My father fought to make
sure that didn’t happen to us, and even when I didn’t have the courage or
strength to hold on with him and wanted to give up, he held on for all of us.
He continues to do so today.
Below is an open letter, written by my father,
regarding his most recent legal battles and struggle for freedom. Please share
his story far and wide and help his legal team in whatever way that you can.
Thanks for your support.
Greetings
Gentle Folk, Supporters, Workers, Interested Individuals, Elders, Young Ones,
and All People Struggling.
This is my 40th Year of incarceration and it even
gives me pause when I think about it because it turns towards the obvious
question, WHY?
By law and legal application, there is no answer for
why. But if we pondered about hidden motivations or descent into the mire that
distinguishes itself as human value and concerns, then the answer is quite
clear. But in any case, ours is the desire to educate and be educated through
enlightenment. A means, a way, to seize the time and force real consideration
towards my release.
The law in the beginning, said, “you will serve a
minimum of 25 years of incarceration with the maximum term of life if it is so
deemed that criminal activities remain an aspect of your incarceration.”
Well, I have records dating from 1998, the first time
I came up for parole. These documents stated that “you have an exemplary
incarceration record of work and program completions. As well as a strong,
complimentary discipline history. However. Due to the serious nature of your
crime, release is not recommended at this time.”
Thereafter, from the year 2000 to 2012 I have been
remanded, denied release, each and every time I appeared in spite of my
continued accomplishments of program and outside accredited achievements. The
statement of “exemplary and distinguished good discipline” resounds throughout
each and every one of my parole appearances.
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
It is for us to distinguish when and where officials
deviate from guidelines and implement their own personal agendas. The authority
they are claiming in keeping me incarcerated was never granted to them, but
belongs to the Courts, Judges and Legislators. It is not the Parole Board’s to
appropriate.
Next we should ask ourselves. If it were so blatantly
obvious that they are doing this to you Seth, what are the chances it might
occur to someone close to me? A loved one, a friend, or a friend of a friend.
Shouldn’t we all come under the dictates of the law as equal representatives of
society?
If you are in agreement, lend a hand. Donate a small
portion of your earnings that we might take the fight to the courts loud and
clear. We are a society of workers, parents, students, and teachers. Members of
communities in need of honest laborers and socially conscious members. Let us
say NO to those who would usurp and take possession without legal claim or
authority of your God-given rights.
Stand up, stand firm and lets correct a continued case
of criminal activities within the state. We do not surrender our rights to be
heard, seen and understood. We must come together and struggle for what is
right. Prisoners who have done their time should be released so that they can
go home to their families and contribute to making this world a better place.
RESPECTS!
Love and Support in yours and my endeavors.
Robert Seth Hayes
Please send contributions for the Legal Defense Fund
for Robert Seth Hayes to Nate Buckley, 438 Massachusetts avenue, Buffalo, NY
14213. Please send an e-mail confirmation to buckleynate1@gmail.com to make
sure that it was received.
If you wish to send a letter to the parole
commissioners requesting my release and asking them to bring closure to our
communities as a whole, send your letters c/o Cheryl L. Kates, P.C., Attorney
At Law, PO Box 734, Victor NY 14564.
Your efforts are honored and appreciated. Stay Strong.
Know that your love and support provides support and
strengthens Seth’s and others determined to prevail.
Crystal, I know you love your father and wish to see him returned to you, but you have neglected to state some important facts for us to judge the situation and decide whether to send money.
ReplyDeleteRobert Seth Hayes was convicted of killing a NYC policeman. Do you have any facts about the case or subsequent trial?
When police came to arrest your father at his home, there was an altercation, resulting in resisting arrest charges and assault on an officer. Any details known on this other than the similarly worded blogs and letters from numerous web sites? People seem to be copying one another rather than quoting actual facts.
Some of the web references conflate the two events. Others ignore the cop killer convictions and only mention his home arrest. What details or references can you supply us?
Crystal, still waiting for more information. If you and Carl classify your father as a "political prisoner," then please supply the information to justify the designation. It's hard to give money to a cause that is not yet defined.
ReplyDeleteThanks for responding. I am not an attorney. Please refer to his attorney Cheryl Kates (see above for her contact information) for any legal questions about his case, arrest, sentencing, or even donations. To your other question, I did not give my father the title "Political Prisoner." He was declared a Political Prisoner by Amnesty International. Again, thanks for your inquiry. Peace
ReplyDeleteDuring the formative period of the case law in Canada, is the royal courts constituted only one among many for a in which in the English could settle their disputes. The royal courts operated alongside and in competition with ecclesiastic, manorial, urban, mercantile, and local courts. Royal courts were not organized into a hierarchy; instead different royal courts were in competition with each other. Substantial law on almost all matters was neither legislated nor codified, eliminating the need for courts to interpret legislation. Common law's main distinctive features and focus were not substantial law, which was customary law, but procedural. The practice of citing previous cases was not to find binding legal rules but as evidence of custom. Customary law was not a rational and consistent body of rules and does not require a system of binding precedent. Before the printing press, the state of the written records of cases rendered the stare deices doctrine utterly impracticable.
ReplyDelete