Support Rev-elution with a contribution at: Cash App - $CMizzou, or Venmo - $Carl-Kenney-1
Thank
Black Jesus and all the disciples it’s over.
That’s my first thought
in the aftermath of an election that drained my will to believe in the advent
of a collective Black agenda. Elections are about people. They’re also about
policy decisions. This election was also about defining and redefining what it
means to be Black in a city known as the historical hub of Black prosperity.
Yesterday’s primary
followed a city council election that seemingly shifted the power of Durham
politics. The Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People (DCABP)
celebrated the election of Mayor Elaine O’Neal, Mayor Pro Tem Mark-Anthony
Middleton, DeDreanna Freeman and Leonardo Williams – all endorsed by the Black
political action committee.
DCABP members touted
the victory a statement against an agenda to further defund the police. Were we
witnessing a historical shift back to DCABP controlling Durham’s political
landscape, or was the previous election about more than local endorsements?
The battle for PAC
supremacy is what separates Durham from other communities. Durham isn’t trapped
in tension between political parties. Republicans are rarely welcomed in Durham’s
political culture. Ours is a battle among varied interpretations of what makes
a progressive agenda.
What do we learn from
yesterday’s election after DCABP taking a major ass whipping? The perception of
DCABP assuming PAC supremacy hit the brakes after candidates endorsed by People’s
Alliance (PA), Durham Association of Educators (DAE) and Indy Week defeated
candidates endorsed by DCABP.
Valerie Foushee defeated
Nida Allam in the race for U.S. Congress; however, Allam won in Durham. Foushee’s
strength outside of Durham was enough to defeat Allam by more than 16 percent.
What are the lessons
for Durham’s Black community?
A Divided Black Agenda
I wonder if the
founders of DCABP foresaw a day with multiple Black candidates pitted against
each other? The group that met for the first time on August 15, 1935, were
called “a committee of influential Negroes”. They drafted a creed to promote
voter registration, to run and support candidates who promoted an agenda that
benefits Black people and the support of initiative to improve education,
health, housing and economic power in the Black community.
Yesterday’s election underscores
the complications related to endorsing and electing Black candidates with varied
perspectives involving public policies impacting Black life in Durham.
What happens when
multiple Black people run for the same office? Some conclude its democracy at its
best. It also unveils the mounting tension between electing Black people to
office while promoting an agenda reflective of a common Black agenda. The days
of naming and supporting Black candidates supported by the DCABP is
circumvented by processes outside the control of the Black people gathered with
the expressed desire to speak on behalf of other Black people.
The ultimate question
regards the ongoing purpose of the DCABP. Black candidates no longer need the
affirmation of the DCABP. Is that a good thing? Is it a bad thing, or is it
just a thing?
More critical in this
conversation is the surfacing of multiple Black led platforms and candidate
slates. Voters endured the pressure of campaign workers with varied
combinations of Black candidates. Yesterday’s election felt more like a civil
war between Black people with different agendas.
This raises another
fundamental question. Is it relevant, in 2022, to seek and implement an agenda
aimed at addressing concerns of Durham’s Black community? Even more, is it valid
to assume such an agenda can only be formed by a community of all Black people?
Are the Black people endorsed by PA and DAE doing Black stuff better than the
people endorsed by DCABP?
These are sensitive
questions best addressed among Black people, but which Black people? Is it time
for the Black people endorsed by PA and DAE to hold camp with the Black people
endorsed by DCABP? I’m suggesting a massive readjustment related to the construction
and implementation of a Black agenda.
As for this current
moment, Durham is limited in addressing concerns involving Black people due to
a severely divided Black agenda.
Grumbling in the Midst
I’m among the people
who cheered when Donald Hughes, candidate for the district 2 school board seat,
publicly rejected participating in PA and DAE’s endorsement process. I
celebrated even more when Hughes blasted INDY Week for the reporting on the
story involving his decision. There’s no doubt his public repudiation of INDY
Week ended the possibility of receiving their endorsement.
I rooted for Hughes due
to the significance of a possible win. Winning with no endorsement from PA and
DAE would significantly speak to the limited power of PAC endorsements. I
wished for a win due to the magnitude of that story.
Hughe’s statement
introduced a troubling brewing development. Black people, once aligned by
allegiance to the DCABP, broke from the ranks. Alternative Black candidates
received support from Black people fueled by a variety of issues. Some
personal. Some policy based.
The uncivil war
presented in public view. District Court Judge Pat Evans failed to receive the
endorsement from DCABP. The local press received news leads from people
opposing Evans. It became nasty.
The personal mudslinging
came from numerous camps. The collateral damage involves the depleted
reputation of numerous first-time candidates. Will they be able to run again?
Maybe. Does it matter? I sense a more pressing question.
The grumbling in the
midst distracts from the importance of a Black agenda. There are no villains in
this story beyond the deterioration of Black solidarity. Sadly, there is an
absence of heroes charged with the task of rescuing the Black community from
the appearance of massive dysfunction.
Yesterday’s election
relates the story of diminished dreams. This is the story about what happens
when the determination to win elections takes precedence over the implementation
of a progressive Black agenda.
Durham’s Black
residents endure the encumbrance of living under the shadow of a once promising
future. The life and legacy of Black Durham remains as a collective memory. The
former Black Wall Street. Old Hayti with streets laced with successful Black
businesses. The pride of Black life in Durham serves the people with the
resources to remain glued to their dreams. Left are the disillusioned children
with parents with barely enough to pay their bills.
I’m left beholden to a
creed established long ago. A vision inspired and nurtured by Black residents.
I pray we’re not
witnessing the death of those dreams.
No comments:
Post a Comment