My father once told me he’d rather a person calls him
a Nigger to his face than to share those feelings behind his back. That way you know who you’re fighting
against.
My issue with the Klu Klux Klan is more about the
sheets they wear. They have a right to
share their feelings, but show your face and buckle down for an ass whipping
once the fire dies down from that burning cross.
I’ve always known judges hold racist views toward
black and brown people. You can tell by
the way they manage proceedings in the courtroom. Spend some time at your local courthouse and
you will soon discover that justice is unjust for people of color.
Many are assumed guilty before they step in the room.
Those called to administer the law cling to racist
notions that have deep bearing on the verdicts they hand out. It’s all part of the game that has long been
preached among those who fight for the Racial Justice Act and the revamping of
a system made dirty by the views of those who hold the power to take freedom
away.
The outrage over comments made by Judge Edith Jones
make it easy to overlook she is not alone.
Jones is judge of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. On Feb. 20, during an address at the
University of Pennsylvania law school, Jones was heard saying “racial groups
like African-Americans and Hispanics are predisposed to crime," and that
they are "prone to commit acts of violence" and be involved in more
violent and "heinous" crimes than people of other ethnicities.
A formal complaint was filed Tuesday by several civil
rights groups, including one funded entirely by the government of Mexico. The complaint alleges Jones said Mexicans
would prefer to be on death row in the U.S. than serve prison terms in their
native country, and that it's an insult for the U.S. to look to the laws of
other countries such as Mexico.
The charges against Jones are laid out in a 12-page
complaint filed in New Orleans where the appeals court is based. The affidavit
contends Jones engaged in conduct that "undermines public confidence in
the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, and creates a strong
appearance of impropriety."
Jones was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan
in 1985. She has served as chief justice
since October 2012.
The complaint also claims that Jones said defendants'
claims of racism, innocence, arbitrariness, and violations of international law
and treaties are just "red herrings" used by opponents of the death
penalty. She allegedly said claims of "mental retardation" by capital
defendants disgust her, and the fact that those defendants were convicted of a
capital crime is sufficient to prove they are not "mentally
retarded."
The complaint claims she said a death sentence
provides a service to capital-case defendants because they are likely to make
peace with God only just before their execution.
Members of the coalition formed to address Jones’ said
her comments resembled those made during the trail of Duane Buck. Buck, a black man in Texas, was sentenced to
death in 1997 for the murder of his former girlfriend and another man. During Buck’s trial, a psychologist listed
race as a factor in Buck continuing to pose a risk. Although called to the stand by the defense,
the prosecution used the testimony in her closing argument.
John Cornyn, then Texas Attorney General, used the
case to show how race played a role in determining death sentences.
"Judge Jones's comments are frighteningly similar
to those that violated Duane Buck's constitutional rights," said Christina
Swarns, one of Buck's lawyers and director of the Criminal Justice Project of
the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund.
The uncovering of Jones’ racist agenda came hours
before the repeal of North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act. The law allowed death-row inmates the right
to challenge their sentences based on racial bias claims.
Under the law, inmates were allowed to use state and
county statistics and other information to claim race was a factor in
determining their sentencing. Opponents
of the law say the law clogged up the courts and has denied justice to victims.
Jones’ comments demonstrate how race is used to
determine the fate of those charged with crimes. Most disturbing involving the
discussion related to Jones is the lack of deeper dialogue regarding how her
views are part of the common culture among those who rule the law. The fallacy of a colorblind system becomes
more perplexing when it lacks the type of checks and balances critical in
protecting those assumed guilty based on their race.
America’ problem goes deeper than state legislators
are willing to concede. The magnitude of the problem can be traced to President
Richard Nixon. In 1973, Nixon created
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a way to target black people.
“You have to
face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise
a system that recognizes this all while not appearing to,” Nixon is quoted saying in Dan Baum’s Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the
Politics of Failure. Baum lifted the quote from the diary of Nixon’s Chief
of Staff, H.R. Haldeman.
Nixon’s war on drugs was an all-out war against black
people. Jones proves an agenda to continue
the strategy of Nixon. The state
legislator preserves the same by failing to acknowledge the link between race
and incarceration.
Jones is an old fashioned racist wearing a black
robe. I’m beginning to wonder if those
serving state government have a white robe in the closet.
I’d rather they call me a Nigger to my face.
Start running when the fire goes out.
