Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Rev. Jerry Young elected president of the National Baptist Convention USA, Inc. despite oppossition to women in ministry

The National Baptist Convention USA, Inc. has morphed into the Southern Baptist Convention.  Sadly, few have noticed.  Even more disheartening is no one seems to care.

When Rev. Jerry Young was elected as president of the National Baptist Convention, no one stopped to question his position on women in ministry.  Young, pastor of New Hope Baptist Church in Jackson, Mississippi, was elected during the 134th annual session of the convention last week in New Orleans.

Young received 3,195 of the 6,400 votes cast. He won on a platform that promises to modify the organizations infrastructure.  Masses of women voted for Young despite his opposition to women in ministry. Men who serve with women on staff voted for young. 

No one seems to care.

Young’s promise for infrastructure modifications was enough to entice members to place the needs of women on the backburner.  Women voted against their own interest, and men made a statement regarding the power and privilege of men within the National Baptist Convention.

The national press failed to cover Young’s election. With more than 7.5 million members, the National Baptist Convention is the largest black denomination in America. At one time, half of America’s black population was a member of the convention.  The lack of national coverage reflects the groups dwindling influence, and the election of Young speaks to the group’s lack of sensitivity related to women in ministry.

No one seems to care that Young has publicly denounced women in ministry.  No one seems to care about the lingering message sent to the more than 10,000 women ordained by churches within the National Baptist Convention. 

How do you preach to women after voting for a man who fails to affirm a woman’s  role in ministry?  What justice is left for the women who endured going to divinity school, and paying the price to serve in leadership, only to be told there is no room at the table for them?  How do you justify voting for a person who refuses to embrace women?  How do you convince women to continue to trust their calling when the president of the convention is on record in opposition to their service?

Where is the justice for women in ministry? Why no outcry?  Why aren’t women fighting?  Has the patriarchy silenced their resistance? Have they been sold a theological perspective that legitimizes their demoralization?

Have they been told it doesn’t matter?  Has the autonomy of the local church been used to rationalize the promotion of a man who opposes women in leadership?  If this is true, why worry about national leadership?  If the president of the National Baptist Convention isn’t elected to promote the common values of local churches, why worry?

What meaning is there beyond the preferment of a national agenda? Shouldn’t the national president present an agenda that reflects the direction of churches across the country?  Wouldn’t it help if the convention presses congregations to affirm women in leadership? What about other issues that impact public space? If not, what’s the role of the National Baptist Convention beyond it being a fellowship designed to promote the personal agendas of the pastors who attend?

There was no mention of Young’s position on women in ministry.  The national press missed it.  No one seems to care. The silence reflects the sad truth about the National Baptist Convention.  Its purpose is in promoting its own agenda.  It has limited voice beyond the purview of the internal matters of the convention.  For many, there is comfort in the limits of the convention.  Others wonder what could be if the convention moved beyond the walls of the institution.

Woman helped it happen.  Men are content with maintaining the status quo.  Lost in the silence is the prophetic voice of the Church.  As the world shifts in the direction of change, the church refuses to engage in real dialogue related to the implications of change. 

The worst part is no one noticed.

When you’re deep into subjugation, you simply take the mistreatment thrust your way.

Let the women of the Church say amen.

Corrections:
1.The National Baptist is NOT the larges AA denomination. The COGIC now has that distinction
2. Women did speak out. I went on twitter and I know Carolyn Knight was on Facebook as were other women.
3. Lorena Parrish, a member of the Women of Color in Ministry Council also blogged about this

8 comments:

  1. Sad...and women still out number men in most churches. Rev. A. Williams

    ReplyDelete
  2. Come to the AME Church , we practice what we preach with Women in Ministry

    ReplyDelete
  3. While I didn't support Young, as a pastor who is a former journalist, it would help to cite these "public" instances where Young denounces women in ministry. Is he on tape, on YouTube sharing these sentiments? And were any of the other recent presidents progressive on women in ministry? The Pentecostals (not COGIC) and the AMEs are the most progressive. And yeah, the vote speaks more to the convention's irrelevance than any message the denomination wants to send. I mean, presumably the Progressive National Baptist Convention supports women in ministry. How many women pastors are leaders in PNBC? Has PNBC had a woman president or vice president? Black denominations -- generally -- matter less and less. And what's the point of elected women just to have women, if they are as theologically regressive as the men? We need quality theology and leadership, not quota theology and leadership.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well NBC isn't getting quality from their vote for YOUNG that's for sure. They voted for him because they are scared of IMPROVEMENT. They cheated for him, oops, I'm sorry, voted for him to stay where they are...STUCK! There is no evolving with that group until they decide that IMPROVEMENT is needed. Through improvement comes CHANGE!

      Delete
  4. You just can't fix stupid. Please see my book women with wind in their wings.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Many of us have had to go along just to get along with what those who were around in the early 1900's described as modernism. The contributors in the Busy Pastors Handbook 1929, 1988 reprint warned us of these days. The Holy Scriptures are clear and until about the early 70's was practiced in the local New Testament Church in our community. Welcome to the future!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Many of us have had to go along just to get along with what those who were around in the early 1900's described as modernism. The contributors in the Busy Pastors Handbook 1929, 1988 reprint warned us of these days. The Holy Scriptures are clear and until about the early 70's was practiced in the local New Testament Church in our community. Welcome to the future!

    ReplyDelete