It was on a Christmas night.
In the state named for the flowers
Men came bearing dynamite
It could not be in Jesus’ name
Beneath the bedroom floor
On Christmas night the killers
Hid the bomb for Harry Moore
Langston Hughes
Her words
struck a loud chord. I told her I’ve
never been able to make that statement. Everything
I’ve chosen has been for others. None of
it, when it comes to the work I do, has been for me.
I wonder if
this is the consequence related to being part of the post Martin Luther King,
Jr. generation. Those who entered
ministry after the assassinations of Medgar Evers, Fred Hampton, Harry and
Harriette Moore, Malcolm X and King did so out of a deep allegiance to the
sacrifices they made. We entered this
work committed to continue what they started, and we did so knowing the costs
associated with taking those bold steps.Ours was no cheap grace with promises of mega-congregations and massive expense packages. We did it for the people we served. There was work left undone, and, we believed, God was calling us to finish what the ancestors started.
My friend’s words reminded me of the enormous burden that comes with saying yes. No, we weren’t carrying crosses that fed an unhealthy martyr complex. We didn’t bring dysfunctional emotional baggage to the work of ministry. We regarded the calling, and work of ministry, as the continuation of work started long ago. We felt and embraced the pain that stirred revolts led by Gabriel Prosser in Virginia in 1800, Denmark Vesey in Charleston, South Carolina in 1822, and Nat Turner in South Hampton County, Virginia in 1831.
We embraced
the model of theologically trained ministers like Henry McNeal Turner, the
first southern bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal Church after the Civil
War. Turner was elected to the state legislature in Georgia in 1868. We took pride in his accomplishments, and
sought ways to follow his footsteps.
We did it for
the cause. It came out of a sincere commitment to the work behind us and the
enormous challenges ahead. This, we
believed, is what it means to be called.
We walked away from more lucrative professions. The pay in ministry was derisory comparative
to other options. We said yes to the
people.
I say we with
the assumption I’m not alone. When I
consider the sacrifices of the men and women who mentor me to this day, I’m
reminded of why we do this work. As I
read the emails from Dr. J. Alfred Smith, Sr., who ministered in Oakland,
California during the turbulent years of police brutality, I recall what it
means to sacrifice. When I read letters
sent to me by Jeremiah Wright, who taught people in Chicago, Illinois to say it
loud, I’m black and I’m proud, I’m grateful for the positions he took during
extreme ridicule.
This is what
it means to serve. It’s about standing for right even when it could result in
conflict. We’re reminded of why we say
yes to this work. Never should it be
said we do it because of ourselves. Our
being called means doing it because we are called to make a difference, not
because it’s the fastest path to fulfill our personal agenda.
This is my
frustration with the work we do. The
calling to serve has been supplanted by the desire to achieve. Lost in the quest to hear the voices of the
least of these, is the personal thirst for achievement. The calling to transform the world is
supplanted with ecclesial political maneuvering essential in remaining planted
within positions of power and ceremonial privilege.
Is that a
calling, or the ego interfering with a higher purpose?
Or, have the notions
regarding calling changed for the generation once removed from the deaths of Evers,
Hampton, Harry T. and Harriette Moore, Malcolm and King?
Those are
questions worth pondering.
As for me, I’ve
never been able to decide based merely on how it impacts just me.
I wish I
could, but there’s this thing we call a calling.
No comments:
Post a Comment